![]() |
|||||||||||
A reasonable analysis of the evidence. |
|||||||||||
This web site was created to explain in detail what really happened to United Flight 93 on 9-11-01. In order to find out the truth, I will examine the evidence like a detective trying to solve a murder case. I will first examine the reports of eyewitnesses, then examine photos of the crash site, and other evidence. We will also look at some of the questions that people have about the flight and the crash that has led to several conspiracy theories. Ok, let’s dive in and see what the eyewitnesses have to say. Rather than list repeatedly the same reference data, each separate article I quote from has a reference number which you can find at the end of this article. Eyewitnesses
Ok, we have a pretty good picture of the last few minutes of United Flight 93, as viewed from the ground. It descended quickly, was traveling very fast and low, banked hard to the right, flipped over completely, and nosedived straight into the ground. On impact there was a huge fireball that rose up about 200 feet followed by a mushroom cloud. Afterwards, there were only small pieces of the plane and its contents to be found anywhere. About the loud bang noises, some people said the engines were very loud, others that the engines did not sound right, some that they made a loud bang, and some said it made no sound. Either some people were farther away than others, or the plane’s engines were cutting off and on, which was probably what caused the loud bangs. If you recall, there were witnesses who said the plane's engines were making the loud band noise just before they cut off; or perhaps off and on with a bang. Look at the bold type in the last quote above. PhotosNow lets look at photos of the crash site to determine if they agree with what the witnesses said. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
The obvious question at this point is: Where is the plane wreckage? Most plane crashes are with the plane trying to make a landing, even if it is in the woods. Few if any planes have ever impacted at a 90 degree angle. The force of the impact with the huge explosion of the jet fuel caused the plane to burst into a billion pieces. Volunteers have spent countless hours walking the field and the woods gathering up mostly small pieces of the plane and its contents. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
| Only a few pieces were more than a couple of feet long. | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
The only legitimate question here is why the white plane was not ordered to land like all other planes? Oooo! Government conspiracy, conspiracy! Well, perhaps it was asked to land, then someone decided that it could be useful to locate flight 93 visually; and after flight 93 dropped off the radar, to see if it could spot the wreckage. Perhaps the only reason it went up in the first place was to look for flight 93! OH! NO! Could it be true?? NO MYSTERY HERE, NO SMOKING GUN, not even a smoking BB gun! What follows is more of their supposed evidence.
There is one witness that is clearly lying He is John Fleegle the manager of the Indian Lake Marina that is THREE MILES away from the crash site:
Fleegle had just returned to the marina to get fuel for a boat that had run out of gas when Carol Delasko called him into the drydock barn to watch news of the World Trade Center attack.
“All of a sudden the lights flickered and we joked that maybe they were coming for us. Then we heard engines screaming close overhead. The building shook. We ran out, heard the explosion and saw a fireball mushroom,” said Fleegle, pointing to a clearing on a ridge at the far end of the lake.
Fleegle, Brant and a fellow marina worker, Tom Spinelli, jumped in a truck and rushed to the crash site. (13)
This statement is fine as it is, but in another report he makes statements that show he is lying:
"Was standing watching on TV and the lights flickered in the building. About that time we heard the engines roar and we took off out of the building. As we were coming up from the office out through the building, the ground shook and we heard a big "boom", looked over and saw the big ball of fire up in the air.
Like I said, probably within, within 45 seconds or a minute of impact, we were there. We were there before any fireman, any paramedics, or anybody; we were on site. When we got there, there was a plane flying up above and he was smart, he flew straight for the sun, so you couldn't, you couldn't look at it and see exactly what type of plane, or if it was a fighter or what it was. But we caught a glimpse of it and as he was swinging, he was basically traveling in the same direction as the plane.
Since the Indian Lake Marina is three miles away from the crash site, how could he have arrived within one minute of the crash? No, he did not arrive before anyone else. As we have already learned, there were people who lived within blocks of the crash who were there before him, and there were even two people working in the area who actually witnessed the crash. So he is clearly lying
Now notice his statement about the plane. Fleegle said the plane flew up in the direction of the sun so that no one could look up and clearly see it. Does this guy actually expect us to believe this yarn? There were people looking up at flight 93 from ALL DIRECTIONS. The only way to have the sun blocking your view is if you are looking east; since it was just after 10 a.m. Those people who were looking north toward the crash, or looking south or west toward the crash, were not looking into the sun, so they did not have their view of any other plane blocked by the glare of the sun. Yet, this guy is saying that the pilot intentionally flew in such a way as to prevent him from getting a clear look at the plane. HA HA HA Fleegle was just a spec of nothing on the ground to that pilot! He must like being interviewed, and keeps coming up with stories to tell.
In the same quote, he continues with more outlandish lies. He quotes what a retired Air Force man told him. If this statement is real, then he too is incredibly stupid, but I do not believe that a career Air Force man would be this stupid, so the following statement is just another of John Fleegle's tall tails:
So I was sitting there talking to another guy . . . retired from the Air Force and soon as he heard me say that he immediately stopped me . . . he said, "Well, I'm retired from the Air Force." He said that plane was shot down and I said, "Why?" and he said because whenever the flickered, they zap the radar frequency on everything before they shoot and he said, "That's why your lights flickered. Your lights didn't flicker from the impact, your lights flickered because they zapped the radar system before they shot it."
HA HA HE HE, I cannot stop laughing! If you are going to shoot down a fighter jet, then you do need to jam its radar so it cannot detect the missile as it approaches and so the pilot can take defensive action. But passenger jets DO NOT HAVE RADAR THAT CAN DETECT INCOMING MISSILES! HA! HA! HA! "This is your captain speaking. Please buckel your seatbelts. I will be taking evasive manuvers because of incoming missiles!" HA HA HA "Incoming! Incoming!"
As further "proof" that flight 93 was shot down, they present this under-whelming bit of evidence:
Further verification that some kind of military aircraft was operating in the area is scientifically irrefutable.
At 9.22 am a sonic boom - caused by supersonic flight - was picked up by an earthquake monitoring station in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles from Shanksville. (18)
Oh my! What big pea-brains they have! First, that area was a military flight corridor, so if there was a military plane in the area it would have been NORMAL operation! Especially since we were UNDER ATTACK! But, consider this: a sonic boom is only caused by a plane going at mach 1 or faster, which is 800 miles per hour. At that speed, it would have traveled the 60 miles to Shanksville in only 4.5 minutes, so it would have arrived in the crash area by 9:27 a.m., more than 30 minutes before flight 93 arrived. It would have intercepted flight 93 within 10 or 15 minutes, hundreds of miles west of Shanksville. Again, NO EVIDENCE HERE!
But in their infinite stupidity, they offer even more amazing evidence. There was yet another plane piloted by a local farmer who was in the air near flight 93.
Local pilot Bill Wright (pictured, left) told Team 4 investigator Paul Van Osdol that he thinks that he witnessed a struggle for control of the plane.
Wright was flying over Youngwood, Westmoreland County, and was getting ready to land in Latrobe under order from air traffic control.
Then, an air-traffic controller asked him and his passenger to look out the window.
Wright was flying a Piper Arrow when he spotted a jet crossing behind him -- about three miles away. It was close enough for him and his photographer to see the United Airlines colors.
Wright was flying over Youngwood for about 20 minutes before Flight 93 crashed in Stonycreek Township.
Wright said that he knew that there was a problem when air traffic controllers asked him to give them Flight 93's altitude.
Wright thinks there's only one reason air traffic controllers in Cleveland would have been asking him about the altitude. He said that it was probably because the terrorists had cut off all radio transmissions to air traffic controllers.
"We figured there was a hijacking in progress, and we were seeing it happening, but that's all we knew," Wright said.
Wright got another clue when he and his passenger saw the path that the plane was taking.
"(It) went behind us. (We) lost sight for a while and when it came back (the passenger) said, 'It's turning toward us. Now it's turning away. Now turning back toward us.' So it was rocking its wings.
"It would bank hard left, bank hard right and then back to hard left. We saw it bank three or four times before we got away from it."
Wright said that may have been when several passengers were fighting back against the terrorists.
"The story of the plane being taken over, that fits," Wright said.
Within moments controllers ordered Wright to land immediately.
"That's one of the first things that went through my mind when they told us to get as far away from it as fast as we could -- that either they were expecting it to blow up or they were going to shoot it down, but that's pure speculation," Wright said. (22)
There you have it ladies and gentlemen! WHAT MORE PROOF COULD THERE BE?! No, there is NO EVIDENCE HERE! Flight 93 was flying up and down, left then right, so it is NOT strange that the little plane was told to get as far away from flight 93 as possible. If United Flight 93 was traveling at 500 miles per hour, it was traveling 8.33 miles per minute. Which means it could travel a mile in 7.5 seconds. So it was VERY DANGEROUS to be anywhere near that plane. They were also under a no-fly order, so it is not strange that they were ordered to land! Duh!
The conspiranuts will say, "how could any explosion send a piece of mail 8 miles? It must have fallen from the plane long before it crashed." Lots of things happen you cannot fully explain, such as when a tornado throws a piece of straw into the center of a telephone pole. Tornados have been known to pick up objects and set them down miles away totally unharmed, even live people! It happens more than you think, but it reasonably should not ever happen. Read this info from USA Today Weather Guys blog:
The article "Tornado Oddities" from the July/August 2002 issue of Weatherwise magazine has several amazing stories about people and objects thrown great distances by tornadoes. For instance, the world-record for long-distance object transport is a personal check that traveled 223 miles from Stockton, Kansas, to Winnetoon, Nebraska, via an F3 tornado in 1991....
Babies have also been carried by tornadoes. Canadian weather historian David Phillips tells of a tornado that picked up a baby girl from the buggy of an Uren, Saskatchewan, family in 1923. After a 10-hour search, the girl was found asleep in a shack two miles from the point where the buggy had been upset." (23)
There are web sites and books about the oddities of tornados:
The Great Bend, Kansas tornado of November 1915 is the tornado which seems to have a great number of oddities associated with it. . . .
At the edge of Great Bend, the Charles Hammond house was unroofed. The family was completely unaware of the damage until they came outside to survey the neighbor's damage. At Grant Jones' store, the south wall was blown down and scattered, but shelves and canned goods that stood against the wall were unmoved. The Riverside Steam Laundry, built of stone and cement block, was left with only a fragment of upright wall, yet two nearby wooden shacks seemed almost untouched. At the Moses Clay ranch, on the east edge of town, 1000 sheep were killed, the most ever killed by a single tornado. A cancelled check from Great Bend was found in a corn field, one mile outside of Palmyra, Nebraska, 305 miles to the northeast, the longest known distance that debris has ever been carried. A "rain of debris," receipts, checks, photographs, ledger sheets, money, clothing, shingles, and fragments of books fell on almost every farm north and west of Glasco, 80 miles to the northeast. In Great Bend, an iron water hydrant was found full of splinters. (From the book, Tornado: Nature's Ultimate Windstorm; http://www.tornadoproject.com/oddities/oddities.htm)
So mail being sent 8 miles by a huge explosion is certainly no stranger than mail being sent 100s of miles by a tornado. Not only did items get sent a long distance, there were other oddities with flight 93, just like what takes place with tornados. For example, a neck tie was found still tied, but with no one in it. (17)
So there is no proof or even evidence that points to flight 93 being shot down by a missile, it DID NOT HAPPEN.
The conspiranuts even use something as trivial as the red bandanas that the hijackers wore as evidence that it was not a real hijacking or that the government was behind it. They say that green is the color of Islam, so why would they wear red? The reason is because red is the color of martyrdom! Yes, it is true! If someone had faked the whole thing then they would most likely have used green bandanas, but red is evidence that it was not fake. It is not widely known that red is the color of martyrdom.
One of the passangers locked himself in a restroom and made a call to 911 emergency. Some sources say the call was short and he made no mention of white smoke, other sources say he claimed to see white smoke out the window after hearing a loud noise. My sources say that claim is false, but let us suppose for the sake of argument that he did hear a loud noise and see something out the window.
Dispatcher Glenn Cramer said the man repeatedly said, "We're being hijacked!" and that his call was not a hoax.
"He heard some sort of explosion and saw white smoke coming from the plane and we lost contact with him," Cramer said. (20)
So what do we make of this call? The call was placed at 9:58 a.m., just 5 to 8 minutes before the plane crashed. With what we have learned thus far from the eyewitnesses, it is very likely that what he heard was one of the loud bangs that came from the plane's engines, whereupon he looked out the window and saw what he believed to be white smoke. Notice that it was "white" smoke. What he saw was likely what are called contrails, which are vapor trails.
![]() |
ALL their SUPPOSED evidence can be proven false and discarded by this same kind of reasonable analysis. But some people just WANT to believe in conspiracy, and they will continue to believe in it regardless of how much evidence points to the hijackers as the people who planned and executed the operation. These nuts are the kind of people who would not believe that we went to the Moon. Yes, it is true; there are many conspiranuts who believe that we FAKED THE MOON LANDING! HA! HA! HA! They just don't have the ability to believe in anything. They are natural born disbelievers and spread their false conclusions throughout the world online. People should be required to take an IQ test before they are allowed to post conspiracy garbage online!!
I used to know one of these nuts personally who believes that contrails that can be seen trailing behind some planes is the government spreading chemicals on the general population of this country. In truth, they are just vapor trails, actual clouds that are created by moisture in the air and forms because of the plane passing through the air. It is truly sad that some people are so stupid, but they are.
IF THIS INFORMATION is not enough evidence for you, here is PROOF that a hot fire can soften steal beams, which is what happened when the jets impacted the World Trade Center.
Here is an email from a guy who recently read this article (2-18-08):
I just read your article debunking the conspiricy theories on the shooting down of flight 93, and I want to say nice job. I was in New York on 9-11 and as a patriot and a poly sci major at Harvard planning on running for office, it makes me sick to read that conspiricy garbage.
I used to work as a location manager on movies, and I heard that the kid that started the 9-11 conspiricy movement in the first place, was shopping around a script a year earlyer about the government blowing up a building to start a war. Then after 9-11 he started saying it happened for real. Like you said, some people just need to get noticed no matter what.
Good article.
This article written entirely by, Michael Fortner copyright 2007, all rights reserved. The author has a B.A. in communications, is certified in computer repair, and currently does IT repairs such as computers, TVs, medical equipment, etc.
News articles
| Send your questions and comments to me here: |